JerryPbury
Well-known member
It’s all good. Can’t do anything about it but make her feel comfortable. It’s just life.Oh man…that’s tough. I wish you the best possible outcome on everything.
It’s all good. Can’t do anything about it but make her feel comfortable. It’s just life.Oh man…that’s tough. I wish you the best possible outcome on everything.
Very useful info, cheersI had some time this morning to try measuring the transformer coils again and got the problems figured out out - I had a bad cable / connection.
Moby's BV12 specs out perfectly - really close to Neumann ratios of P:S 8, P:T 22. I measured the rms voltage across the P:S and P:T injecting a signal of 1Vrms at 1kHz and 15kHz
For Moby's, The P:S n=6.86 and the P:T n=21.02. I checked that the two coils were balanced as well and they were very close.
For the Ioaudio however, I found the problem. The P:S was correct n=6.86 but the P:T n=1.53. This means the tertiary voltage was almost 14 times higher than it should be. One interesting thing is I tested the two coils separately as well and one of the coils was correct, having a P:T n=22 but the other coil was way high and out of spec, so perhaps the winding plan was OK but there were shorts in some of the T coils. This would explain why some people were able to build correct mics with them. The ioaudio tested the same at 1kHz and 15 kHz
I have a second ioaudio in a m269 that I will pull out and test.
My sig gen died when I was calibrating mine, haven't gotten around to replacing it. It certainly wasn't easy or quick, but I got mine to where it's versatile. Is it a U67? I don't really care. It's a great mic. Most versatile mic that I've ever used.You absolutely cannot determine if the amplifier frequency response is correct by ear. It not only depends on a capsule response but it depends on what experience an individual has and wants out of a mic. Someone could dial in a mic to be something they like but it may be brighter or darker than how someone else would do it, and it may or may not resemble a real u67. It would say nothing about the amplifier being -10dB at 15kHz.
To do it without a computer, use a signal generator to inject a signal at the calibration input at a range of frequencies (40 Hz, 1kHz, 15 kHz) and measure Vrms of the output with a scope. The signal should be -10 dB with 15kHz WRT to 1 kHz. The Neumann manual describes how to do it before there were computers
And it takes eq like a champ…boost high end 10db and it is still smooth. Not that it needs it but just sayingMy sig gen died when I was calibrating mine, haven't gotten around to replacing it. It certainly wasn't easy or quick, but I got mine to where it's versatile. Is it a U67? I don't really care. It's a great mic. Most versatile mic that I've ever used.
Thanks for measuring it. Actually ratio should be P/S 6,92:1, P/T 21,6:1. Of course, some magnetics loss is always present and of course small measuring errors.I had some time this morning to try measuring the transformer coils again and got the problems figured out out - I had a bad cable / connection.
Moby's BV12 specs out perfectly - really close to Neumann ratios of P:S 8, P:T 22. I measured the rms voltage across the P:S and P:T injecting a signal of 1Vrms at 1kHz and 15kHz
For Moby's, The P:S n=6.86 and the P:T n=21.02. I checked that the two coils were balanced as well and they were very close.
For the Ioaudio however, I found the problem. The P:S was correct n=6.86 but the P:T n=1.53. This means the tertiary voltage was almost 14 times higher than it should be. One interesting thing is I tested the two coils separately as well and one of the coils was correct, having a P:T n=22 but the other coil was way high and out of spec, so perhaps the winding plan was OK but there were shorts in some of the T coils. This would explain why some people were able to build correct mics with them. The ioaudio tested the same at 1kHz and 15 kHz
I have a second ioaudio in a m269 that I will pull out and test.
Thanks for that info. My scope may not be perfectly accurate also - it actually gives me a calibration error on boot up.Thanks for measuring it. Actually ratio should be P/S 6,92:1, P/T 21,6:1. Of course, some magnetics loss is always present and of course small measuring errors.
+1. Much easier to source and also won't draw any current from the heater circuit. (But I'm using 220V lights as I'm in Europe)Easier to order these from elsewhere.
Carling toggle switch
Fender type lamp holder
Either a 6.3v lamp (on heater circuit) or a 120v lamp
I usually use a 120v lamp as it doesn't add current to the heater circuit
That’s DIY. I you have limited tools it’s important to check specs on all parts.I just received the above recommended switch and lamp holder. The lamp holder is way too big again for the hole! I presumed the Poster didn’t modify the enclosure but he must have and didn’t understand the question. I don’t have a drill that can accommodate a bit that size. Do they make lamp holder that are smaller specifically the size of the hole in the
What is the diameter of the hole? I have several collective cases psu enclosures and they have a ~17mm hole for that type of lamp, above the power switch.I just received the above recommended switch and lamp holder. The lamp holder is way too big again for the hole!
Enter your email address to join: