and workers exposed to those workers, perhaps even immediate family that they are living with.crazydoc said:My own thoughts on vaccine priorities are as follows:
1) Workers with direct exposure to infected patients
that is interesting... trading off some additional losses in high risk groups, for more quickly slowing the community spread. The math of which approach saves more lives is not immediately obvious (to me).2) People of age 18 to 49 - these are the largest proportion of the infected (in CA, 45% of the population and 60% of the cases), and are the least invested in curtailing its spread (bars, parties, avoiding mitigation measures, exposure in the workplace). Their immunity would have the greatest effect on curtailing the pandemic, though they are probably the least likely to accept vaccination
That involves a lot of people. Logical if they are indeed essential. Note: politicians are not essential.3) People of other ages who work in essential jobs,
that group are already near the top of the list being floated with preference by age (oldest first)... While an economic benefit analysis does not necessarily agree. Certainly vaccinate nursing home workers at the same time.and residents of care homes
Children are not considered high risk for mortality. Are you talking about young women? Is there some research about risk for this group I have not heard about, besides the obvious?4) Under 18's and pregnant women, once it is determined they can be safely vaccinated
A quick search reveals somewhat reduced immune response for pregnant women, and something like 5% of pregnancies who contract covid suffer serious symptoms (pneumonia, per NIH blog). This is higher than the general public rate which is well lower than 5%.
why give seniors any at all? They are old and no longer have anything of worth to contribute to society. :5) All others - retired seniors should be last, since they are more able to isolate than others, and contribute the least to a functioning economy (except as consumers.)
At some point the blowhard politicians need to stop bad mouthing vaccine just because of who promoted the development program. This political badmouthing will reinforce some in the low information public to boycott vaccines when they finally catch up with demand (next year).Of course, vaccine availability and emotional responses would make this untenable.
JR