Ptownkid said:
I'm really disappointed that everyone keeps overlooking one simple fact...Chuck was already supplying these bodies to the community. What makes this place special is that most people have respect for each other and that there's a feeling of community. There was no need whatsoever for these bodies to be sold by someone else...
It makes me sad that I seem to be the only one that feels this way, or at least the only one willing to say it out loud.
Yes, from what I understand there are basically two separate matters at play here.
I was going to mention those in ChuckD's thread, but my earlier questions weren't answered and when I saw all his relevant posts were deleted, I let it be.
But I might as well mention them now.
1. Starting a group buy that is already being taken care of by another member.
2. Taking advantage of someone else's design.
ad. 1.
One could debate if a gentlemen's agreement should suffice or if we maybe need some clear "rules" about that one. Or agree on nothing and leave it all free. Each member will have his or her own preference, but as long as it's clear which one of the options is the standard here, at least we'll have something workable.
ad. 2.
Chuck claimed he developed this body with SY. He also on several occasions compared the matter to the development of the Equinox U47 body. For the latter there was a mammoth thread of 72 pages in this here Microphones section. And another 45 pages in the White Market section. It is very clear who did the actual work there, who made the drawings, who contacted several factories etc. etc. etc. For the SYT-5 those details were not clear at all. And at this point they still aren't fully exposed. ChuckD was asked more than once to shed some light, but AFAIK, he didn't. No timeline and other details.
Also, he was very rude and used bad language towards Chunger, i.e. in my book.
Then he started threatening members who were dealing or were going to deal with Chunger. Those would be put on his blacklist, i.e. he would not sell anything to those members anymore. This move wasn't very successful, obviously. He later "lifted the ban".
Then he said he was disappointed in just about all members, because they did not support him.
The above is what I remember and mostly it's in my words. But many other members surely saw it all, before most was deleted.
Now had ChuckD put his focus on matter #1 alone, and had he stayed reasonably polite, I'm pretty sure he would have gotten support from quite a few members, though likely not all. But unfortunately that's not what happened.
I personally am thankful for what he did for the forum. But the final lack of support was for a large part his own doing, as far as I can see.
Sorry to say.
Still, there's always the chance to set things right. And that goes for all members.
Edited to correct the spelling in one important word: gentlemen (plural rather than singular).