I generally don't prefer to talk in riddles, but I'll try here:
"Dickinson's attitude toward spiritual matters was more complex than [...]
Interesting choice of poet to
underline faith / believe.
Emily Dickinson did indeed keep the form of Chanted Prayers for her poems, showing in the metre and rhyme scheme. But among the almost 1800 poems she wrote throughout her lifetime, one can hardly find a
single one that fully affirms and embraces (Christian) faith. There are very few outrageously ambiguous ones, but not a single one that fully defends faith. Odd isn't it?
Most of the time there is one single twist in the length of a line, in the rhyme scheme, alongside very subtle choices of words, elipses etc etc that (indeed often hidden deep inside much like in a riddle) makes the entire thing (poem & religious belief) fall to pieces. Interestingly, Dickinson embraces and even celebrates (much like in a prayer song) this unknown and even uncanny that a world without a God, a world without the safety net of religious faith, of which she had more than an inkling, was bringing.
Dickinson was on the verge to modernism after all, and in many poems she clearly crossed that line. Maybe it also frightened her. As a matter of fact, during most of her life, she hardly ever left the house !! But I understand that to have been rather caused by the fact that the entire community she lived in consisted of firm believers and avid church goers -- and she most certainly would have been the more than 'odd one out'.
Dickinson wrote about (Christian) faith showing serious cracks. And what revealed itself beyond (like 'light'), namely a world without the affirmative nature and 'safety net' of faith -- had better to be told in a 'slant' way. -- Opposite of the interpretation above.
-----
Recommendation -- to anyone interested in Christian faith:
(1) Read the Tanakh after learning Biblical Hebrew (to get the original).
(2) Add the Apocrypha and the Kumran scrolls to you reading list (to put things into perspective).
(3) Put aside Nietzsche and re-read William James 'Varieties', cos in some experiments (different book though) he was almost a precursor to what we call neurology today). James is a true eye-opener and full of light -- puns intended.
Apart from that:
-- Can't argue taste, experience and faith. --
Peace to all. 8)