Winetree
Well-known member
I'm going to have to open a Microsoft account to see the above link. Don't want to do it.
Any other way to get the wiring?
Any other way to get the wiring?
kmozart said:FINALLY Got the body and the Thiersch M7 Blue capsule!!!
VERY Excited! So, where do I wire the front, back and the pole wire? I'm missing that somehow...
THANKS!
kmozart said:Done!
Microphone sounds Great!!!
I'll post some pictures and samples soon, so busy at the moment. So far, used it on vocals, cello, and acoustic guitar and love it!
One question;
I have built a U47 out of the oliver's kit at tab-funkenwerk, and K49 capsule. Comparing it to the D49, D49 is about 15 db lower on the output. Is that normal?
Phrazemaster said:Dany I have a question. On the prosound forum Oliver made the following statement about the 5840 vs the 701:
"It is a EF732 aka 5840. It is in no way similar to an AC701 but easy to obtain, most of them are usable right out of the box and the impedance matches the BV11 with a 2.2k cathode resistor.
There are at least over 500k of those tubes out there and not the best microphone tube by design, it is something that does get the job done if you just want a good sounding DIY project.
EC70, 71, EC1000, AC761, etc. ?????
There is no tube that has identical characteristics with reference to technical data, nor sound, noise, etc.
Best regards,
Oliver Archut"
(Find discussion here: http://repforums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/topic,32454.30.html)
Winetree said:I got an e-mail that Rigglers bodies are shipping,
I have to decide on a mic transformer using the 5840 tube.
I'd like to save some money and use the T-49, but if the BV's are better, I'll pop for those.
Any real use comments on the BV11A, vs. BV11R vs. the T-49.
Pip said:So it is done X 3! Decca tree here I come.
Equinox D47 Capsule matched X 3. Max K's Transformer. Riggler and TSguys bodies. My own designed and built PCB for swapping out 5840 tubes. Yay!
See Pix. A bit of a rush job with this post sorry I will fix it up when time allows. They all sound great but now the tube selection begins!
kidvybes said:Phrazemaster said:Dany I have a question. On the prosound forum Oliver made the following statement about the 5840 vs the 701:
"It is a EF732 aka 5840. It is in no way similar to an AC701 but easy to obtain, most of them are usable right out of the box and the impedance matches the BV11 with a 2.2k cathode resistor.
There are at least over 500k of those tubes out there and not the best microphone tube by design, it is something that does get the job done if you just want a good sounding DIY project.
EC70, 71, EC1000, AC761, etc. ?????
There is no tube that has identical characteristics with reference to technical data, nor sound, noise, etc.
Best regards,
Oliver Archut"
(Find discussion here: http://repforums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/topic,32454.30.html)
...and it should also be noted that Oliver implemented that very same 732 (5840) submini in his design for the Telefunken RFK AK-47, and later his own Blackspade UM17, both mics of which he described as being U47/M49 influenced...
Once again if you want to use the venerable AC701 get your wallet out as you will have to buy several and hope that one is mic grade. They run about $400.00 a piece these days.
Electricity makes me nervous!
Enter your email address to join: