remsouille
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2012
- Messages
- 218
ruffrecords said:To reiterate all I said three years ago was using the logo might infringe Neve's copyright to which the OP replied 'which is why we didn't' which clearly means we did not use the logo. The picture posted recently clearly demonstrated that this was not true. I am not arguing about whether it does or does not infringe but rather that the OP said he did not use the logo and then did use it.
Cheers
Ian
Ok, I'll sum it all up in total transparency so we can move on. The first picture I posted of the modules had Neve logos on them. Just to be clear, ALL THE ROUTING MODULES ON MY CONSOLE PROJECT DO HAVE NEVE LOGOS. When Ian first told me about a possible infringement, I photoshopped the logos out and reposted the photos and then replied: "Which is why we didn't ". That sentence along with the blinking smiley meant "Oops, you're right, let's not show these logos on here, let's not attract attention on the community". I honestly thought Ian and whoever was following the thread had understood what I meant, since the photos were exactly the same as before minus the logos, but obviously this was not the case and I'm sorry about it.
This is all in good faith. I personally don't care if all my photos have Neve logos on them, since I'm not selling anything, and these modules obviously would never pass for real Neve products. Heck, I could even post a picture of myself with a fake home made Nike T-shirt, no one could reach me. I was photoshopping the logos out out of courtesy for the trademark-sensitive folks out here and out of respect for the community. I'll make sure I photoshop each and every photo from now on. Or maybe I shouldn't. Should I?