I have been watching "Ranked choice" voting in Maine since 2016. I am still watching it.Those votes rightly don't belong to two parties, however they do 'steal' and 'spoil' just by the underlying mathematics of how elections are conducted, where every single vote in excess of the winning threshold is 'wasted' (e.g. you can only win so hard). Given both parties always declare a mandate regardless of the actual vote thresholds renders it even more meaningless.
I feel a push for ranked-choice voting nationwide would actually change the underlying dynamics as it would eliminate wasted votes and allow people to vote for the actual candidate that represents their views (if such a candidate actually exists). It would also greatly lessen the practical impacts of Citizen's United.
Between Biden, Trump, and RFK Jr, it would make for an impactful difference between the following rankings:
1) RFK Jr, 2) Biden, 3) Trump
1) RFK Jr 2) Trump, 3) Biden
Rather than a vote that's otherwise 'thrown away'.
I'm sure the founding fathers would be horrified though...
Interesting but involves different pros and cons.
===
IMO our founders were smart to limit the power of elected officials. They have been angling to get around those limitations forever. Spending by both parties is out of control. We need to starve the beast.
JR