user 37518
Well-known member
Sure, because most engineers in the industry work on that.I don’t think AI is anywhere close to sending anyone to the moon or Mars; or sending satellites out. That’s the coding I’d be focusing on.
Sure, because most engineers in the industry work on that.I don’t think AI is anywhere close to sending anyone to the moon or Mars; or sending satellites out. That’s the coding I’d be focusing on.
There’s certainly a lot of bases and contractors with the military that spin off that type of coding.Sure, because most engineers in the industry work on that.
"A lot" doesn't convey anything. Realistically, a large percentage of SW jobs are business middleware, web front and back end code, and UI stuff. The more difficult hard engineering positions will take longer to automate, but what happens when, say, 30% of the easier SW jobs become 40% more efficient with AI "assisting?" 12% reduction in high-paying white collar SW jobs. And a call to "learn to hammer," maybe.There’s certainly a lot of bases and contractors with the military that spin off that type of coding.
I guess that, in a not so distant future, most of the "intellectual" jobs will be supplanted or assisted (as you say) by AI. Perhaps the only hope for the majority of people will be to resort to trades, as many have been saying for years now; "don't go to college" rings a bell."A lot" doesn't convey anything. Realistically, a large percentage of SW jobs are business middleware, web front and back end code, and UI stuff. The more difficult hard engineering positions will take longer to automate, but what happens when, say, 30% of the easier SW jobs become 40% more efficient with AI "assisting?" 12% reduction in high-paying white collar SW jobs. And a call to "learn to hammer," maybe.
Overworked to me sounds much better than unemployed. Plus, what's wrong with working too much? I enjoy work. Ora et labora.Glory halleluja for the overworked. I'm sure the corporations will praise you for believing that.
Freemasonry written all over the place.
ThanksSure is dark subject matter , but Im just trying to be as realistic as I can about the conundrum we find ourselves in .
Point taken though , I'll try lightening up a bit
Even tik tok has announced that they will censor climate posts. It is unclear what the Chinese position is other than to be disruptive.The "dark subject matter" we should be concerned about are developments like this:
https://public.substack.com/p/united-nations-harvard-and-facebook
I almost finished reading a book (which I highly recommend) called "Broken Genius", it is the biography of William Shockley, one of the Nobel prize laureates for the discovery of the transistor effect. In William Shockley's mind there was also an idea of impending doom, he also thought environmental disaster was around the corner (in the 1960s), but what bothered him the most is the idea that 'stupid people' were reproducing at a faster rate than 'intelligent people', and the end result was (in his mind) that the human species would 'devolve' into a lower intelligence life form, reaching dire consequences. He came to the conclusion that some races were dumber than others, and started openly promoting sterilization of black people, abortion, and other similar ideas; something which he called "dysgenics", which is no other than eugenics or a soft form of Nazism.Thanks
I worry about the mental health of young people being constantly bombarded with doom and gloom messaging. If we were to believe the nonsense about our planet being destroyed in only years from climate change, long range future plans make little sense.
JR
Enter your email address to join: