Spencerleehorton said:
I put a sine wave into the input and get my scope on pin 1 and offest pin (not offset as silk screen is wrong) i get a nice sine wave which i can see on the scope.
when i adjust R36 there is a very small point where the wave appears, the shape of the sine only seems to get wider than the actual shape change?
I don't get it! Do you have rev3 board or older?
I used custom made probe (made out of old sharp screwdriver with 470uf cap in series) and insert it into Offset pin (hole with ring around it in the detector section).
It should be very straightforward to see wave on the oscilloscope (I used cubase's built in plugin "multiscope"), and wave should look like the picture Abe put in his CLX Manual rev3.
If you don't get this waveform shown right, I'd guess that is where your problems are. As a first take in troubleshooting, I'd swap all the ICs in the detector section. As a matter of fact, when I did mine, I noticed that out of 10 LM301 ICs one was faulty! So try to swap those - maybe you have a faulty one.
Spencerleehorton said:
rms symmetry i have no idea how to do?
I found that this is super-confusing.
What I did - I took a different software to do it!
I couldn't get anything ot of RMAA software. So I took Smaart 7 and set it into FFT mode. When I sent sine wave into the unit I monitored output in Smaart. Distortion is very visible. Now the most important step is to set compression to 20db. I send -10dbFS signal from my computer, set ratio to none (CCW) and treshold to CW, and just adjust output to have -10dbFS on the input of my computer. That is unity gain without compression. Than as a next step I set treshold and/or ratio pots just to get -30dbFS on my input into computer. As the compression kicks in, distortion is more noticable on the FFT analyzer. And than it's time to tweak R34 to get the second harmonic at the lowest point.
I had a lot of problems here since whenever I tweaked R34 the level of the sine would go up and down. So it was unclear if I was reducing the second harmonic or just going up/down with the output level. In the end, I found a compromise with lowest second harmonic compared to third harmonic, without going too much off with the output level.
At some point I was like "damn, I don't care!"! That's when I stopped and decided that RMS is calibrated!
Spencerleehorton said:
level calibration doesnt seem to work?
As I've said in previous post, all of my problems with level calibration were directly due to the wrong meter switch. I had lorlin rotary and it was impossible to get a good reading on R79. But when I got pushbuttons to replace rotary it was all good.
Spencerleehorton said:
threshold knob adjustment doesnt seem to work as threshold knob does nothing?
1:4 ratio calibration doesnt seem to work either?
You won't get this part of the calibration if previous steps are not done properly! When you get them right, this will be a breeze...
Spencerleehorton said:
is the thing im missing here that R109 should be disconnected before trying any of these?
as this sees to be the next step.
Yes! Keep it disconnected!
Luka