It seems to be a giant misunderstanding. Allow me to explain. Someone linked my post from gearspace detailing my findings from an article that contains an interview about the C800G. I was asked, "why didn't I make any comments on the PSU." I wanted to clarify, that I am no expert, I am only going by my findings on the interview, and other research on the web about what makes the C800G unique to compared "clones." This isn't about me being a subject matter expert on the C800G. I have never designed a microphone, it was only to share my interest in why the designers chose the design choices they made, in the C800G.So, is this a theroethical issue or are we talking about building an authentic (whatever that is) C800g microphone?
That's the thread title, just a reminder, this is not your thread.
Again, have you built a mic with a PSU yet?
If this is just meant to be a poetic description of the topic, GS is actually the better place for it in my opinion.
Open up a new thread, maybe it will run a bit better than the old one.
I have NEVER said that my word/opinion is worth anything more than my opinion. What you regard as facts / marketing jargon, is your perspective. Not mine. If you have an issue with "marketing jargon"...you should take that up with the designers...not me. That is what I think where our disconnect is...you disagree with my findings. This isn't my issue. My only statement was to clarify my post. That is all.
IF YOU THINK THE PSU, is more of a contributing factor to the sound of the C800G...then please post YOUR FACTS AND YOUR FINDINGS. This will be more helpful than to accuse others of misinformation.
The burden of proof is on the accuser. Your beef, is not with me...it's with the original article that contains the interviews with the designers. My money is on them and their ideas.