Bo Deadly
Well-known member
This particular wording is confusing since the EGC is frequently referred to as "earth ground" or "E" or "protective earth" or "PE".Notice that earth ground is not involved in ANY of this.
This particular wording is confusing since the EGC is frequently referred to as "earth ground" or "E" or "protective earth" or "PE".Notice that earth ground is not involved in ANY of this.
I wish UL wrote their spec more carefully but that is indeed logical.To add to the terminology confusion, NEC (National Electrical Code or just "Code" in the US) refers to the 3 conductors as the "ungrounded" or "line," the "grounded" or "neutral," and the "grounding" or EGC (equipment grounding conductor). One has to read the language of the Code carefully to avoid confusing grounded with grounding.
+100But, to the point about fault current, it's important to remember that ALL current flow returns to the source of voltage that is causing the current flow. In the case of fault (or normal load) current, this is the transformer serving your building - and it returns via the neutral conductor from your breaker panel to the transformer. The normal load current will flow to the neutral via the neutral conductor in the branch circuit wiring. But, if an equipment fault occurs, the fault current flows to the breaker panel (and utility neutral0 via the EGC or "safety ground" conductor. Notice that earth ground is not involved in ANY of this. The situation would be identical in an airliner and the wiring is the same. Earth ground is not a universal "sink" for utility power currents. However, earth ground is exactly where lightning currents need to flow to in completing the circuit (for cloud-to-ground strokes - there are cloud-to-cloud strokes that do not involve earth).
I don't think it's inappropriate to refer to EGC as "ground". It is connect to "the ground" (as in soil) enough to hold 0V references to the same potential which can be important w/ audio devices that don't use Jensen transformers. So it serves a purpose other than as a return for fault currents. Just because currents are not flowing into the ground (as in soil) doesn't render the concept of being "grounded" invalid.I suspect the term "ground" came into use when the only known source of electricity was lightning - think Benjamin Franklin and kites - and has become deeply rooted in our terminology.
Hold 0V "reference" with respect to what? How would you explain EGC in an airplane other than as a fault current path?I don't think it's inappropriate to refer to EGC as "ground". It is connect to "the ground" (as in soil) enough to hold 0V references to the same potential which can be important w/ audio devices that don't use Jensen transformers. So it serves a purpose other than as a return for fault currents. Just because currents are not flowing into the ground (as in soil) doesn't render the concept of being "grounded" invalid.
I'm not saying there's anything wrong with the concept of grounding for safety. It's just that the word itself is so vague because of being used to describe circuit connections. The "ground" in an airplane or boat is the hull or frame (nothing to do with earth) and the "ground" in any piece of gear with a 2-wire AC cord is undefined ... it simply floats ... but it's not a hazard (provided it's UL listed) and also useable in audio systems. It confuses a lot of people. And it doesn't take a ground rod at your home to keep neutral within a safe voltage with respect to actual soil because the utility company ties the neutral to earth in many, many places before it gets to you. The only reason you have a ground rod (electrode) at a home is to keep a strike from getting inside the home.Hold 0V "reference" with respect to what? How would you explain EGC in an airplane other than as a fault current path?
I like to joke that ground is a concept, not a node or voltage...
JR
I don't think it's inappropriate to refer to EGC as "ground". It is connect to "the ground" (as in soil) enough to hold 0V references to the same potential which can be important w/ audio devices that don't use Jensen transformers. So it serves a purpose other than as a return for fault currents. Just because currents are not flowing into the ground (as in soil) doesn't render the concept of being "grounded" invalid.
With respect "to the same potential" as in with respect to all interconnected devices. Devices are bathed in E and H fields which can create significant common mode noise on line and neutral. So by holding everything near ground, even gently through a small resistor, might make a big difference in noise performance. You can't do that without the EGC conductor.Hold 0V "reference" with respect to what?
For an airplane you do not need ground as a reference because the airplane is not connected to anything else as it is quite literally floating. Except perhaps when mid-air refueling in which case there is no doubt the aviation equivalent of an EGC conductor that must make contact first to discharge the two aircraft and bring them to the same potential.How would you explain EGC in an airplane other than as a fault current path?
Go to https://centralindianaaes.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/indy-aes-2012-seminar-w-notes-v1-0.pdf
Read carefully starting at page 17. See especially pages 27 and 29. Earth ground rods are ONLY a measure against lightning. Earth grounds do NOT protect people from being electrocuted when equipment fails (as it often does) in a way to put full AC line voltage on its touchable parts. Safety ground provides a low-impedance (low enough to cause a high fault current to trip a breaker) path back to NEUTRAL, not earth ground. I had a guy who was preaching this gospel of "use your own ground rods instead of neutral" (as page 29) kicked out of a trade show - I reminded the show staff of their legal liability letting this moron promote this deadly practice!
I don't understand. Is there something about that diagram that would stop fault current from getting back to neutral? I see neutral lines running into each breaker. What is it about this that you think might be construed as "faultly"?Does that mean this wireing is faulty in your opinion?
Neutral and earth/ground aren't connected together.What is it about this that you think might be construed as "faultly"?
So earth is not connected to neutral in an RCBO breaker? That is odd. In that case fault current would go through the earth ground electrode, through soil to neutral at the utility pole. Probably not a good arrangement for a studio.Neutral and earth/ground aren't connected together.
yes they are but only at the mains distribution panel.Neutral and earth/ground aren't connected together.