Agreed. Still, all we have is Elon’s “Dumps”, whatever that means. We can “interpret” those however we want here in public, and we do with endless radio, tv, and internet talking-heads taking the lead for us to regurgitate online and to our friends, but unless it becomes “truth” in the eyes of the law through the court system, it is still nothing more than hearsay. It’s legally not a state actor until you prove it is in a court of law.
Subject-verb agreement isn't your grammatical forte, but I forgive your minor error as well as the typo. Maybe you could make actual arguments supporting your belief that the authoritarian control of speech is helpful instead of nit-picking.
Again, until it’s proven in the court of law, it’s nothing more than a political talking-point, regardless of how much we convince ourselves that we know we’re right.
So? Does that mean that you can prevent us from discussing it? More information is released regularly. Did the big news organizations and their acolytes wait for "the court of law" before spinning their stories about, oh, the Covington HS students? Kyle Rittenhouse? Michael Avenatti? The Steele dossier? You really don't get it.
GroupDIY is not the public square.
And Twitter is? Most public squares don't evaporate if someone doesn't pay the electric bill.
Yours is polluted by your preference for Orwellian control of speech and the press. You're on the wrong side of history and the future.
I'm sure we can trust the administration who benefited from the arrangement and strengthened it to honestly pursue the "truth."
Until he came out in support of free speech he was the darling of the neo-leftist climate authoritarians. I still don't trust him completely, but he seems to be doing what he said he would do w.r.t. Twitter and its rotten core. I enjoy watching the squirmers as he continues to be data-driven and much more open than Vijaya and Jacksputin ever were. As for "controlling the flow of information" he did flush that crappy clog, Baker, from the system. Good riddance.
like yeah man...like that's my personal judgement.
I point you to the constitution and bill of rights. That's law.
A bit early for that. I expect rigorous hearings investigating this stuff and more, when the next congress is seated Jan 3(?). We don't need new laws, just enforce the existing ones (may be harder to do than it should be.)
Your arguments sound a bit hyperbolic, you should tweet Elon.
Is that to say Twitter is? What is the difference between GroupDIY and Twitter, business-wise, legally?
Maybe so, according to your opinion, based on Elon’s “Dumps”, that is all it is so far. And is it illegal? Are there are court cases yet?
We patiently wait for the courts to make that determination. None so far, as far as I know.
Yeah, sure. And all the hyperventilating nonsense from the right on this matter is.......what exactly?
Unlikely.
Was any information made available before Musk bought Twitter? Did Jack and Vijaya perjure themselves in Congressional hearings?
And that lack of knowledge certainly won't stop you from spouting off here!!! Thanks for your kind assistance in bringing down the level of discourse just a little bit more--no contribution is too small!!
