It sure looks like a lot of things. You haven't even bothered to provide any evidence of these suspicions. Why would I bother to care about your hunches & suspicions if you don't offer support for them?It sure looks like it.
There's nothing preventing a criminal running for pres--been done before. E. V. Debs did it from the Atlanta Federal Pen, and I believe LaRouche may have done so as well. Trump's problem here is of his own making--if he weren't a criminal, he'd be fine. And if that keeps him off the ballot in a few states... well, he should have thought of that before he did all that crimin'.AGs deciding the ability for a president to run a campaign is interfering in the choice in 49 other states.
I truly wish we had "two" better options but this is what the system has offered us.I'm opposed to lawfare, that why I'm voting for the guy who's explicitly statement he'll use the office for revenge!
Nice try, but he has also talked explicitly about targetting his opponents, a lot.exPresident Trump has "explicitly" stated that his revenge will be success.
So the guy we are not supposed to believe for things he said, we now believe for things he said?Nice try, but h3 has also talked explicitly about targetting his opponents, a lot.
Donald Trump Won't Let Anyone Talk Him Out of Revenge
Trump's unprecedented campaign pitch: Elect me to get revenge on the government
Trump signals he’s out for revenge in second term
etc., etc...
This isn't a riddle. There isn't one door guarded by a guy who always tells the truth and the other guarded by a guy who always lies.So the guy we are not supposed to believe for things he said, we now believe for things he said?
is your anti trump argument that we should?This isn't a riddle. There isn't one door guarded by a guy who always tells the truth and the other guarded by a guy who always lies.
Is your pro-Trump argument that we should never believe a word he says? That's a take I guess.
Well you can look at it as picking the lesser of two evils. But when has picking evil ever been a good idea.So the leading nation in its own 'free world club' has a choice between two fossils as leader ,
its like a Monty Python sketch FFS
It's better than leaving the swamp dwellers completely unsupervised with zero negative feedback, arguably a third evil.Well you can look at it as picking the lesser of two evils. But when has picking evil ever been a good idea.
It sure does! Most extremist violence in the U.S. comes from the political right.It appears that one side is predominantly attacking the supporters of the other.
Not really seeing you complain when, say, the conservatives here hurl insults at the left, to say nothing of your own remarks. Hearts and minds, you say?Perhaps that is just my personal bias.
Enter your email address to join: